|
|
|
What
would Washington say?
Among
the panoply of early American icons, there was only one whose achievements,
intent, mannerisms, fortitude and grandeur carried the ideals of all the
others to fruition. That person was George Washington, the man
who not only embodied American ideals, but dedicated his life to define
them as well.
Of all the founders, he was irreplaceable. Of
all the presidents, he was free from partisanship. His stature of greatness
was recognized in his own time. His sacrifices during wartime were profound.
His civility inviolate. He was keenly aware of how he stood on the axis
of history and was determined not to fail it.
Yes, we had Jefferson the idealist; Adams
the realist; Madison, the architect of government. Each of them,
and many more, played decisive roles. Washington, however, was the rock
upon which they stood, the shoulder that carried their hopes and dreams
into reality. One moment of weakness on his part, one diversion of selfish
ego, and the burgeoning republic would have collapsed.
Washington's noble qualities cannot be exaggerated.
Chief among them were personal character, honesty, and a dedicated concern
for the unity of this nation of disparate states. He saw this nation's
potential greatness, and in that regard, looked not only to the present
but toward the future.
Washington provided a solid foundation for Enlightenment
ideals. The question now turns to us. What are we building on that foundation?
Is it anything like the nobility that was originally intended?
Today's partisanship, and the factions that support
it, have betrayed Washington's vision. For the sake of raw power, politicians
and special interests greedily work to divide the nation along party lines,
each side needlessly opposing and disparaging the other. They have made
a mockery of our union. Truth has become a disposable commodity. The good
of the people has been ignored for the good of the wealthy.
It is sad but true that we daily prove ourselves
unworthy of our first president's legacy. We have sold our birthright
to the short-sighted greed of small-minded leaders and their factional
mobs.
When I see angry people shouting down speakers
at town hall meetings, raise horrific caricatures of our president, and
display guns at political rallies, I see people who have lost all sense
of decency. They do not represent America. America should not be defined
solely by free speech, but by what people use free speech to say. Was
America forged for the propagation of incivility and prejudice? Should
regional prejudices be used to feed disunity? What would Washington say?
I much prefer his valuable insight to the blandishments of today's Tea
Party dynamics, designed to disrupt, disparage and tear down what is good.
What would George Washington say? The following quotes come from his farewell
address to the armies, dated November 2, 1783:
"Who
that was not a witness could imagine, that the most violent local
prejudices would cease so soon, and that men who came from different
parts of the continent, strongly disposed by the habits of education,
to despise and quarrel with each other, would instantly become but one
patriotic band of brothers?"
"In
order to effect this desirable purpose, and to remove the prejudices
which may have taken possession of the minds of any of the good people
of the States, it is earnestly recommended to all the troops that with
strong attachments to the Union, they should carry with them into civil
society the most conciliating disposition; and that they should
prove themselves not less virtuous and useful as citizens, than they
have been persevering and victorious as soldiers."
"And
although the General has so frequently given it as his opinion in the
most public and explicit manner, that unless the principles of the
federal government were properly supported, and the powers of the union
increased, the honor, dignity, and justice of the nation would be lost
forever; yet he cannot help repeating on this occasion, so interesting
a sentiment, and leaving it as his last injunction to every officer
and every soldier, who may view the subject in the same serious point
of light, to add his best endeavors to those of his worthy fellow citizens
toward effecting these great and valuable purposes, on which our very
existence as a nation so materially depends."
Where
do we hear such wisdom and goodness today? Certainly not on talk radio.
Certainly not from conservative politicians in Washington, who delight
on just the opposite, whose idea of smaller government means tearing down
what is best about America and leaving in its stead a vacuum. Certainly
not from corporations that spend millions of dollars on commercial ads
in order to siphon their obscene wealth from the rest of us.
Where are the leaders we sorely need? Glenn
Beck is a twisted caricature of paranoia. Rush Limbaugh, a
bluster bag of noisy ego. Sean Hannity, a small-minded gossip.
Ann Coulter, an exploiter of discord who would say anything to
sell books. Sarah Palin, a ridiculous combination of the empress
who has no clothes and Paris Hilton.
Republican legislators and senators, with their
partisan, paranoid talk about death panels and concentration camps, have
lost their credibility entirely. The ones I respected have been pushed
out of office.
Among the liberals, I still see hope. President
Obama thus far has retained the dignity and integrity of his office,
despite the onslaught of conservative attacks. I consider him the brightest
star in a murky sky.
We need to support him, and can do that only by
responding with truth to those who wish to tear his presidency apart.
Return
|
|